End-to-end Google Search Ads campaign builder. Performs deep keyword research (competitor SEO, review language mining, Reddit/HN community terminology, site audit), builds keyword architecture with funnel mapping and intent classification, creates ad group structure, generates headline/description variants, builds negative keyword lists, recommends bid strategy, and exports a campaign-ready CSV for Google Ads Editor import.
npx gooseworks install --all # then, in Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex: /gooseworks use the google-search-ads-builder skill
Build a complete Google Search Ads campaign from scratch. This skill handles everything from deep keyword research through community and review language mining, to ad copy generation and campaign structure — outputting files ready to import into Google Ads Editor.
Core principle: Most early-stage teams waste their first $5K on Google Ads because of bad keyword strategy and bad structure. This skill builds the strategic keyword foundation AND a tight, well-organized campaign from day one.
From the product description and ICP, generate 3 keyword buckets:
| Bucket | Intent | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Problem-aware | Searching for solutions to a pain | "how to automate outbound", "fix slow sales pipeline" |
| Solution-aware | Searching for a category of product | "AI SDR tool", "outbound automation software" |
| Brand/Competitor | Searching for you or competitors by name | "[your brand]", "[competitor] alternative" |
For each competitor domain, research their organic keyword rankings and ad presence using web_search:
Search: site:<competitor_domain> [product category keywords]
Search: <competitor> SEO keywords ranking
Search: <competitor> top pages organic traffic
Search: "[competitor] site:google.com/ads" OR "[competitor] PPC keywords"
Search: "[competitor]" alternative OR vs OR comparison
Search: best [product category] tools 2026Use fetch_webpage on competitor landing pages and pricing pages to extract the language and positioning they use — these reveal keyword opportunities.
Extract keywords with buying intent — skip informational-only terms.
The exact language buyers use matters more than what marketers think they search. Mine review sites for real buyer vocabulary.
Use web_search to find reviews:
Search: "[product name]" site:g2.com reviews
Search: "[product name]" site:capterra.com reviews
Search: "[competitor name]" site:g2.com reviews
Search: "best [product category]" site:g2.comUse fetch_webpage on the top review pages to extract phrases like:
These phrases reveal how real buyers describe the problem and the solution — gold for keyword targeting.
Reddit threads contain the unfiltered language your ICP actually uses.
Option A — Apify Reddit Scraper (if APIFY_API_TOKEN is set):
POST https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/trudax~reddit-scraper-lite/runs?token=${APIFY_API_TOKEN}
Content-Type: application/json
{
"searches": ["best <category> tool OR software OR platform"],
"maxItems": 30
}Then poll for results:
GET https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/trudax~reddit-scraper-lite/runs/{RUN_ID}?token=${APIFY_API_TOKEN}Once status is SUCCEEDED, fetch dataset:
GET https://api.apify.com/v2/datasets/{DATASET_ID}/items?token=${APIFY_API_TOKEN}Output fields: Each item has dataType ("post" or "comment"), title (posts only), body, communityName, upVotes, url, createdAt.
Option B — Web search fallback:
Search: site:reddit.com "best [product category] tool" OR "recommend [product category]"
Search: site:reddit.com "[competitor name]" alternative
Search: site:reddit.com "[pain point]" solution softwareExtract the terminology, slang, and product descriptions real users use in these threads.
HN discussions reveal how technical buyers describe tools and problems.
Use the free HN Algolia API:
GET https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?query=<product category>&tags=story&hitsPerPage=20
GET https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?query=<competitor name>&tags=story&hitsPerPage=20
GET https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?query=<pain point>&tags=comment&hitsPerPage=30No API key needed. Extract terminology and product framing from titles and comment text.
Use fetch_webpage to crawl key pages on the user's own website:
Identify:
Search: "[category] tool" → note Google autocomplete suggestions
Search: "[category] software for [ICP role]"
Search: "[pain point] solution"
Search: "how to [problem your product solves]"For each seed keyword discovered across all sources, expand with:
Organize ALL discovered keywords by buyer journey stage:
| Stage | Intent Signal | Example Keywords | Bid Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem-aware | Searching for solutions to a pain | "how to scale outbound without hiring SDRs" | Medium — educational intent |
| Solution-aware | Searching for a category | "AI SDR tool", "outbound automation platform" | High — comparing options |
| Product-aware | Searching for specific products | "[competitor] alternative", "[competitor] vs" | Very high — close to purchase |
| Most-aware | Searching for your brand | "[your brand]", "[your brand] pricing" | Must-have — defend brand |
| Intent Type | Ad Group Strategy | Landing Page Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Transactional ("buy", "pricing", "free trial") | Aggressive bid, exact match | Direct product/pricing page |
| Commercial ("best", "top", "vs", "alternative") | Strong bid, exact + phrase | Comparison or feature page |
| Informational ("how to", "what is", "guide") | Low bid or skip — save for SEO | Blog/resource (if targeting) |
| Navigational (brand searches) | Must-bid, exact match | Homepage or brand LP |
For the top 30 keywords, estimate competition level:
| Density | Signal | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Few ads showing, no big brands | Bid aggressively — first mover advantage |
| Medium | Some competitors, not saturated | Bid strategically — differentiate with copy |
| High | Major players dominating | Bid selectively — long-tail variants, exact match only |
| Very high | Big ad budgets, position 1-4 locked | Avoid head-on — focus on long-tail or competitor terms |
| Keyword | Exact [keyword] | Phrase "keyword" | Broad keyword | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [keyword 1] | Y | Y | N | Start exact, expand to phrase after data |
| [keyword 2] | Y | N | N | Exact only — too broad in phrase |
| [keyword 3] | Y | Y | Y | All match types — high-volume, need coverage |
General match type rules:
| Keyword Type | Recommended Match | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Brand terms | Exact | Protect — don't waste spend on broad |
| High-intent solution | Exact + Phrase | Capture precisely, discover adjacent |
| Competitor terms | Exact + Phrase | Control the narrative |
| Problem-aware | Phrase + Broad (with negatives) | Cast wider net for top-of-funnel |
| Keyword | Est. Volume | Intent Strength | Competition | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [keyword] | [H/M/L] | [High/Med/Low] | [H/M/L] | [1-5] |
Priority scale:
Identify the top 10 keywords to launch with — highest intent, manageable competition:
| # | Keyword | Match Type | Intent | Competition | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [keyword] | Exact | Transactional | Medium | [Reason] |
Group keywords by theme and intent. Each ad group = one tight topic.
Structure template:
Campaign: [Product Name] — Search
+-- Ad Group: [Problem Keyword Theme 1]
| +-- Keywords (5-15 per group)
| +-- Ads (3 responsive search ads)
+-- Ad Group: [Problem Keyword Theme 2]
+-- Ad Group: [Solution Category]
+-- Ad Group: [Competitor Alternatives]
| +-- "[Competitor A] alternative"
| +-- "[Competitor B] alternative"
| +-- "best [category] alternative"
+-- Ad Group: [Brand]
+-- "[Your brand name]" (defense)Rules:
Each RSA needs:
| Slot | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1-3 | Keyword match — Include the search term | "AI Outbound Automation" |
| 4-5 | Value prop — Primary benefit | "10x Your Pipeline in 30 Days" |
| 6-7 | Social proof — Credibility | "Trusted by 500+ B2B Teams" |
| 8-9 | Differentiation — Why you vs alternatives | "No-Code Setup in 5 Minutes" |
| 10-11 | CTA — Action driver | "Start Free Trial Today" |
| 12-13 | Offer/Urgency — Incentive | "Free 14-Day Trial" |
| 14-15 | Trust/Risk reversal — Remove friction | "No Credit Card Required" |
| Slot | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feature-benefit — What + so what | "Automate personalized outbound emails so your team closes more deals without the manual work." |
| 2 | Pain-agitate — Problem + solution | "Tired of reps spending 4 hours on prospecting? Our AI handles it in minutes." |
| 3 | Social proof + CTA | "Join 500+ growth teams. Start your free trial — no credit card needed." |
| 4 | Differentiator + CTA | "Unlike legacy tools, [Product] works out of the box. See it in action — book a 15-min demo." |
free (if not freemium)
jobs, careers, hiring, salary, internship
tutorial, course, certification, learn, how to become
review, reddit, quora, forum (if not desired)
login, support, help desk, documentation
download, open source (if not applicable)Industry-specific terms that share words with your keywords but have wrong intent. Based on keyword research, add terms that would waste spend.
Terms that indicate the searcher is not a buyer:
If NOT running competitor campaigns, negative-match competitor brand names to prevent waste. If you ARE running competitor campaigns, apply these as negatives only on non-competitor ad groups.
Cross-negative between ad groups to prevent internal keyword cannibalization. Each ad group should only trigger for its own theme.
| Budget Range | Recommended Strategy | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| < $1K/mo | Manual CPC or Max Clicks | Need data first — don't let Google optimize on nothing |
| $1K-5K/mo | Max Conversions (after 30+ conversions) | Enough data for Google's algo |
| $5K+/mo | Target CPA or Target ROAS | Optimize for efficiency at scale |
First 2 weeks: Always start with Manual CPC or Max Clicks with a daily budget cap. Collect data before switching to automated bidding.
| Funnel Stage | % of Budget | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Brand defense | [X%] | Protect brand searches |
| Competitor capture | [X%] | High-intent, ready to switch |
| Solution-aware | [X%] | Category buyers — highest volume |
| Problem-aware | [X%] | Only if budget allows |
# Google Search Ads Campaign — [Product Name] — [DATE]
## Campaign Overview
- **Goal:** [Conversions / Demos / Trials]
- **Monthly budget:** $[X]
- **Geographic targeting:** [Countries]
- **Bid strategy (start):** [Manual CPC / Max Clicks]
- **Bid strategy (after 30 conversions):** [Max Conversions / Target CPA]
## Research Summary
- Sources analyzed: [competitor SEO, G2/Capterra reviews, Reddit, Hacker News, site audit]
- Total keywords discovered: [N]
- After dedup + filtering: [N]
- Recommended for campaign: [N]
## Competitive Density Map
| Keyword Theme | Your Position | Top Competitors Bidding | Density | Recommendation |
|--------------|--------------|------------------------|---------|---------------|
| [Theme] | [Not bidding / Bidding] | [Names] | [H/M/L] | [Bid / Skip / Long-tail] |
## Campaign Structure
[Visual tree of campaigns -> ad groups]
## Keywords by Ad Group
### Ad Group: [Name]
**Landing page:** [URL]
| Keyword | Match Type | Funnel Stage | Intent | Priority |
|---------|-----------|-------------|--------|----------|
| [keyword] | Exact | Solution-aware | Commercial | High |
| [keyword] | Phrase | Problem-aware | Informational | Medium |
### Ad Group: [Name 2]
...
## Ad Copy
### Ad Group: [Name]
**RSA 1:**
Headlines: [list of 15]
Descriptions: [list of 4]
**RSA 2:** ...
**RSA 3:** ...
## Negative Keywords
### Campaign-Level Negatives
[List]
### Ad Group-Level Negatives
[Per ad group]
## Bid & Budget Recommendations
[Strategy + daily budget recommendation + funnel stage allocation]
## Quick Wins — Top 10 Launch Keywords
| # | Keyword | Match Type | Intent | Competition | Why |
|---|---------|-----------|--------|-------------|-----|
| 1 | [keyword] | Exact | Transactional | Medium | [Reason] |
## Launch Checklist
- [ ] Verify landing pages load and track conversions
- [ ] Set up conversion tracking (Google Tag / GA4)
- [ ] Confirm geographic targeting
- [ ] Set daily budget cap
- [ ] Review ad extensions (sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets)
- [ ] Enable search term report review (weekly)Generate a CSV file importable into Google Ads Editor:
Campaign,Ad Group,Keyword,Match Type,Max CPC,Final URL,Headline 1,Headline 2,Headline 3,Description 1,Description 2Save strategy doc to google-search-campaign-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).
Save CSV to google-ads-import-[YYYY-MM-DD].csv in the current working directory (or user-specified path).
| Component | Cost |
|---|---|
| Keyword research (web search) | Free |
| Review mining (web search) | Free |
| Reddit scraping (Apify, if used) | ~$0.05-0.10 |
| HN Algolia API | Free |
| Site content audit (fetch_webpage) | Free |
| Ad copy generation | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| CSV generation | Free |
| Total | Free-$0.10 |
https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search (free, no key needed)APIFY_API_TOKEN env varRender a 'model comparison grid' video from a config — a fal-style "same prompt, N contenders" showcase — a dark real-DOM stage where per beat a monospace prompt fades in centered, docks to a small top strip, then a labeled 2-4 panel grid (static images OR muted video clips, mixable per cell) staggers in and holds for comparison, plus a minimal end card — frame-stepped via Playwright (video cells are frame-seeked deterministically) and encoded with FFmpeg. Deterministic assembly, FREE (cell media comes from create-image-fal / create-video-fal, music from create-music-elevenlabs), text stays pixel-crisp. Use for the model-comparison-grid format.
Render a punchy ~12s vertical (9:16) music-only direct-response OFFER ad as a 4-beat kinetic-typography film — HEADLINE slam → real PRODUCT drop → CLAIM/proof → CTA pill — from one config of copy slots, a real product photo, a brand palette, fonts, bpm, and beat split. DETERMINISTIC + FREE (a bundled Remotion project; springs + interpolate, no AI-gen for visuals). Backgrounds are engine gradient divs off the palette, props are inline SVG, the ONLY composited bitmap is the REAL product photo (objectFit:contain, never stretched), and ALL headline/claim/CTA/URL/wordmark text is typeset in the engine — never AI-rendered (the format's credibility guard). A driver binds the config to Remotion input props, renders the 9:16 master, and derives a 1:1 center-crop with ffmpeg. Two gating checks run before render (claim verbs must match the product's physical format; the claim beat needs an edge-entry mechanism prop). Use for the motion-graphics-offer-ad format.
Assemble a myth-vs-fact kinetic-typography explainer video ad (≈29.5s, 9:16) from N myth/fact pairs + hook / turn / punch copy + palette + a brand end-card PNG + a VO track — a hook, 3 red-strike MYTH cards that flip to teal-check FACT cards (per-line strikethrough that crosses EVERY wrapped line), a "what actually works" turn, an optional proof reveal, a punch line, and a static end card. DETERMINISTIC assembly with ZERO AI-gen visuals — HTML hyperframes rendered frame-exact via Playwright (`window.renderAt(t)`, animation a pure function of beat-local time), Whisper beat-snap to VO word onsets, concat at a uniform fps, karaoke `.ass` captions burned last (suppressed on the proof + end-card beats), and a VO + optional music mix (music −20 dB, `amix normalize=0`, tail fade). FREE (Python + Playwright + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the copy / palette / end-card / VO and gates the paid VO / music / Whisper calls to their own capabilities. Use for the myth-vs-fact format.