Research a company or idea, define the Ideal Customer Profile, and route to the right next step — either mapping the TAM or finding leads/prospects directly. The entry point for any "find me leads", "map my market", or "who should I sell to" request. Auto-loads when a user provides a company URL or idea and asks for leads or market mapping.
npx gooseworks install --claude # Then in your agent: /gooseworks <prompt> --skill icp-identification
Research a company or idea, define the Ideal Customer Profile, and route to the right next step. This is the entry point for any "find me leads" or "map my market" request — it sits upstream of all lead-finding and TAM-building skills and ensures we understand the business, define the target, and pick the right approach before executing.
When triggered, collect these inputs from the user:
If the user provides a company URL, research it using web tools before asking follow-up questions. Don't ask questions you can answer from the website.
Intake principle: Every answer here should help you populate a search filter (title, industry, headcount range, region) or an exclusion filter (titles to skip, industries to ignore, company types to avoid). If a user's answer is too vague to become a filter value, probe deeper. Don't ask generic strategy questions — ask questions that sharpen the search.
Using web search and the company URL, investigate:
Output: Synthesize findings into a brief (5-10 bullet points) and present to the user for validation. Example:
Research Summary:
- Company sells X to Y
- Main competitors: A, B, C
- Typical buyer: VP/Director level at mid-market companies
- Purchase triggers: scaling team, switching from legacy tool, new budget cycle
- Pricing suggests mid-market / enterprise buyer
Ask the user: "Does this match your understanding? Anything to correct or add?"
Based on research + user input, propose a structured ICP:
| Dimension | Recommendation | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Job Titles | e.g., VP Sales, Head of Revenue Ops | Direct buyers of sales tools |
| Seniority | e.g., VP, Director | Budget authority at this deal size |
| Company Size | e.g., 51-200 employees | Sweet spot for this product |
| Industry | e.g., SaaS, FinTech | Highest product-market fit |
| Region | e.g., US, SF Bay Area | Current market focus |
| Signals | e.g., recently hired, posted about pain | Timing indicators |
Present as a table. Ask user to confirm, adjust, or refine. Iterate until they approve.
Define what to filter OUT. These map directly to "not in" / exclusion parameters in search tools:
| Dimension | Exclude | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Titles to exclude | e.g., Intern, Coordinator, Assistant, Student | No budget authority or decision power |
| Industries to exclude | e.g., Government, Education, Non-profit | Product doesn't serve these verticals |
| Company types to exclude | e.g., Agencies, consultancies, sole proprietors | Not a fit for the product model |
| Company size to exclude | e.g., 1-10 employees, 10,000+ | Too small to need it / too large to buy it |
| Specific companies to exclude | e.g., existing customers, competitors, partners | Already in pipeline or not appropriate |
Present exclusions alongside the inclusion table. Ask user to confirm both.
Important: The ICP definition becomes the input context for all downstream skills. Be specific — vague ICPs produce vague leads.
Search precision warning: Downstream tools (Apollo and similar databases) match on the exact title strings, industry tags, and keywords you pass them. Overly broad or stuffed filters (e.g., 15 keyword tags) return noisy results. Each filter value should be specific and intentional. When in doubt, use fewer, more precise values and let exclusions do the narrowing.
Once ICP is locked, ask the user:
"Now that we have the ICP defined, would you like to:
- Map your TAM — Build a scored Total Addressable Market: discover all companies matching your ICP, score and tier them, and build a persona watchlist for the best-fit accounts. This is the strategic, market-first approach.
- Find leads/prospects now — Go straight to finding individual people to contact. This is the tactical, results-now approach.
TAM mapping is best when you want a full picture of your market, ongoing signal monitoring, and a systematic account-based approach. Lead finding is best when you need contacts to reach out to immediately."
If the user chooses TAM mapping, hand off to the TAM builder skill with the ICP definition. The TAM builder will:
When to recommend TAM path:
If the user chooses lead finding, present ranked strategies based on what's available in the skill graph:
| # | Strategy | Skill Used | Best For | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Database search — Search people DB by title, industry, region, company size | apollo-lead-finder | High volume, broad ICP | Low |
| 2 | Pain language — Find people posting about problems your product solves | pain-language-engagers | Warm leads with expressed need | Medium |
| 3 | Competitor audiences — Find people engaging with competitor content | competitor-post-engagers | Leads already in-market | Medium |
| 4 | KOL audiences — Find leads from industry influencer audiences | kol-discovery → kol-engager-icp | Niche, high-quality leads | Medium |
| 5 | Hiring signals — Find companies hiring roles your product replaces/supports | job-posting-intent | Companies with budget & urgency | Medium |
| 6 | Event attendees — Find leads from industry events | get-qualified-leads-from-luma | Engaged, in-market leads | Low |
| 7 | Apollo database search — Search Apollo's 210M+ contact database (free search, paid enrichment) | apollo-lead-finder | Broadest coverage, cost-controlled enrichment | Low |
Recommendation logic:
Recommend 1-2 strategies based on the ICP and company stage. Ask user to pick which to execute.
Once user selects their path and strategy(ies):
SKILL.mdWhen transitioning to a downstream skill, carry forward:
ICP Context (from icp-identification):
Include:
- Titles: [list]
- Seniority: [list]
- Company size: [range]
- Industries: [list]
- Region: [list]
- Signals: [list]
- Product: [what the user sells]
- Competitors: [identified competitors]
Exclude:
- Titles to exclude: [list]
- Industries to exclude: [list]
- Company types to exclude: [list]
- Company size to exclude: [ranges]
- Companies to exclude: [specific names, if any]This ensures downstream skills skip redundant intake questions and start executing immediately. Both inclusion and exclusion criteria must be passed — exclusions are what prevent noisy search results.
Diagnose Meta Ads campaign performance using Meta's actual system mechanics — Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, and Creative Fatigue — and produce structured, testable recommendations that avoid judging segments by average CPA instead of marginal efficiency.
Pre-flight policy check for Meta ads. Takes ad copy plus advertiser context, resolves and fetches the relevant Meta transparency-center policy pages at runtime, and returns a Pass / Fix Required / Block verdict with cited findings and rewrites.
For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.